Conclusion: The End

Written on Thursday, May 08, 2014 by Unknown

10 page thesis essay. i feel.... funny...but a repost :( 

This is it. It's all finished. I can hardly believe it. Oh how time flies...

I feel very accomplished right now. Not Darcy's version of accomplished, but pretty darn close.

And one day I will come to love this question. Actually I kind of already do, now that it's all over anyway.

http://www.troll.me/images/ryan-gosling/hey-girl-what-you-write-your-thesis-on.jpg

Too bad your grammar isn't as good as your face, Ryan.

Also, I feel like this moment calls for some kind of break-dancing gif or something.

Nope. Never mind. I found something better.

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxrro7OTUW1qzexzto1_500.gif 

NO WAIT. This is a far more accurate representation of my feelings:

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/760779/carlton-dance-o.gif

Yep. That's the one.

So anyway, time to conclude. For real this time. 

To recap: My thesis is about transmedia storytelling, particularly how it relates to web series. My artifact was The Lizzie Bennet Diaries (or LBD), a scripted transmedia web show composed of video blogs and a lot of social media. It was very popular and has inspired many similar creations. While it was my baseline and primary example, I was also interested in exploring transmedia in general and how it is a viable format for contemporary narratives. After some investigating I discovered that there is not a lot of literature on transmedia (or web shows for that matter) aside from a few history-type books, but they don't even go into the concept of transmedia that thoroughly. There are few to no theories on the subject but many people do see the potential of this type of narrative storytelling. Because it is so unique and often quite complex, traditional analysis could not be done. I attempted to come up with a new way of looking at transmedia (streams and barriers), but whether or not it is any good doesn't really matter. The point is that we do need a new way to analyze these types of projects (webseries and transmedia) that isn't as limiting as standard film and television criticism.

Well, why did I write about all of this? 

For one, I love it. I find it all to be fascinating and I just love web shows. I think they are an emerging form of media that will eventually be the norm and I think it's so great that it isn't as limiting as TV and film. Almost anyone can make a web show. And the fact that it can easily spread and go viral is amazing. Your audience is much more accessible. Which leads to the main reason why I study transmedia, which is that I love the interactivity of it. I was never able to immerse myself into a show like the way I was able to with LBD. And that, for me, was a total game changer. I want all of my stories to be like that from here on out. It brings the narrative to a whole new level. Or levels.

While researching all of this, I quickly found out that not everyone is on the same brain train as me right now. They don't all share my passion, and frankly there are still not that many people who even know what transmedia is. I hope that in a handful of years this wont be the case, but for now it's webseries that is making a name for itself. Transmedia may have to wait in the wings a little while longer until it's time for the spotlight. Still though, I was a little shocked by the lack of materials out there. Perhaps it would behoove some academics to spread their wings a little and learn more about some emerging types of narratives. Because seriously folks, I really really want to know what people think about this stuff.

Other than research, I also learned quite a bit about transmedia through the process of actually writing this thesis. The first thing I learned is that transmedia is (to borrow from my professors vocabulary) wicked hard. This thesis was an experiment, and honestly I don't think my results were overwhelmingly successful. Not that the thesis itself is bad, but I don't think I really succeed when it came to "systematically dispersing elements across multiple delivery channels for the purpose of creating a unified and coordinated experience" (to borrow from Henry Jenkins). Almost all of my content was on this blog. Only one big part, my theory section, was done via different media and that was because it was a video. Otherwise, the twitter and facebook were rather useless and I just did not have time to make any other videos. So if I gained anything from this experience, it is some serious respect for content creators. Producing all of those elements and then managing all of those outlets is an incredibly difficult task. If I have any advice for future students that want to embark on a thesis such as this, it is: plan, plan, plan. If you want to make a transmedia thesis that is not only about transmedia, but is transmedia, then you need to make a calendar or something. Get organized and figure out how you're going to write and release it all. And find an awesome advisor who is open to trial and error. Props to my professor, who deserves some serious acknowledgements. 
 
Speaking of my professor, she asked me three questions to consider while writing this conclusion. 
1. Why was this important?
2. What does it teach us?
3. Where do we go from here?

Well, for #1 I would say it is important because it isn't going anywhere. Transmedia (and webseries) are here to stay. Almost all of the authors I read said the same exact thing. It may be slow burning, but it's catching on and they all couldn't wait to see what happens next. None of them knew what it meant for the future, but if I had to guess I'd say it also means some major changes for our culture and the way we experience stories. At least here in the US, current generations have been called passive and apathetic. But transmedia encourages participation and immersion, which will probably bleed into other areas of our lives as well - especially because not all transmedia has to be fiction. People want to interact, and they will. New technology and innovations will lead to a more active audience and perhaps a more active generation. And like many of those aforementioned authors, I also can't wait to see what happens. Hopefully I'll get to be a part of it.

Huh, I guess that kind of also answered #3 too. Well as for #2, I think it teaches us that we don't need to stick to the same old conventions and neither do our stories. As I said, people want to engage with narratives on a new level and both transmedia and web shows can provide people with that opportunity. It is exciting, fresh, and innovative. People can get closer to stories more than ever before and that is pretty remarkable. 

I'm not sure what else it teaches us. Maybe in 20 years I'll have a better answer to that question. Once people start to take advantage of this medium and really put it to the test, then we will start to learn more. Maybe more about what it offers, what it can do, or what it means for entertainment as a whole. And not just entertainment, but the dissemination of information in general.

Maybe I'm just a little too enthusiastic, but I do hope that someday someone reads this and some of my enthusiasm can rub off on them. 

But maybe by that time memes and gifs will be super outdated and old school. Just like those annoying "What people think I do/What I really do" memes. I've got to say, the rhetoric ones are really bad. Actually, 9% of the time any rhetoric gif or meme is going to be awful. What an unfortunate fact of life.

Time to wrap it up. Contrary to some of my previous posts where I stress out a lot over this thesis (I am just a lowly undergrad after all), I did have a blast writing it. Everyone else wrote long boring papers and I got to do a super fun blog about Lizzie Bennet! How awesome is that?!

Thank you so much to everyone who helped, encouraged, or simply tolerated me throughout this experience. And don't worry, I'll have a real thank you page up soon. 

And here is one last gif just for fun.

http://24.media.tumblr.com/1071c7c1d1975d9a3faaf314d9b849cd/tumblr_mk4fyrIasg1r5va4eo1_500.gif

Over and out.
-Danny

Analysis: Name That Event!

Written on Sunday, March 23, 2014 by Unknown

Before I finish up my litvestigation (yes, I did just make up an awesome new word) I'd like to play a little game. Well, in a minute.

Right now, I have basically hit a wall. And that's bad. Really bad. Because it is almost the end of the semester which means that this thesis needs to be done. Soon.

I'm not really sure what to do at this point. It's frustrating. And I am verging on disaster mode. 

http://media.tumblr.com/361b81eb66a1f18c592b443942e8e226/tumblr_inline_mfb6q42SJ21rx2s6k.gif 

Whoever told you senior year of college is a breeze is a big fat liar. I don't remember who told me this, but I'm certainly not happy with them. It was probably someone who didn't have a required thesis project. Damn those lucky stress-free people.

So here is my problem:  Even though my analysis section has been started, I haven't actually analyzed anything. 

Which is why I'd like to get back to this fun little game. I'm making it up right now, and it shall be called "Name That Event!" I was thinking about going with "Name that kernel/satellite!" but I didn't like the slash. 

Goal: I need to identify some kernels and some satellites. 

In a previous post I showed you a timeline that a fan had created. This timeline basically made it clear to me that it will not be easy to identify kernels and satellites because there are far too many pieces of media. But if I had to try, here are a few ways I might name some events. (For a review about what events, kernels, and satellites are, check out this video!)

Name That Event!
Option 1:
KERNEL - Lizzie's Videos
SATELLITE - Everything else

Option 2:
KERNEL - Lizzie's Videos
KERNEL - Certain twitter accounts of major characters
SATELLITE - Everything else

Option 3:
KERNEL - All videos by all characters
SATELLITE - All social media accounts

Option 4: 
KERNEL - All videos by all characters
KERNEL - All twitter accounts
KERNEL - Lydia's sex tape website
SATELLITE - Everything else

Option 5:
KERNEL - Certain videos by Lizzie, Lydia, and any other character that explicitly moves the story along
KERNEL - Certain tweets, pinterest boards, or other social media content that explicitly moves the story along
KERNEL - Websites that explicitly move the story along (such as Lydia's sex tape website)
SATELLITE - Videos that do not do much or forward the story and only provide fluff
SATELLITE - Social media that does not do much nor does it forward the story along
SATELLITE - Websites that have no function other than to exist and sometimes re-post information that can be found elsewhere

Option 6:
Some other combination of previous pieces of previous options 
Or make something else up on the spot
_______

Yea guys. This is irritating. You with me now?

But in general, if the game continued and someone were to ask me about specific episodes or something, I could play like this...

Name That Event!
Q: Episode 1
A: Kernel!

Q: Collins and Collins + Maria of the Lu videos
A: Satellite!

Q: Episodes 60 and 98
A: Kernels!

Q: The San Francisco Photo/Twitter Adventure
A: Tough one. It could do either way. Leaning more towards satellite?

Get the idea?
And do you also get the problem? How do I know what is significant and what isn't? Would twitter be the main social media kernel in the social media realm, but a satellite in the greater transmedia story? And what does this tell us?

My conclusion is that this tells me that kernels and satellites cannot be the primary form of identification. Even if I were to use the Scene Function Model (which would make this process a lot easier), that is only actually supposed to be used for television. I need a new model. The Transmedia Function Model or something.

And then there are a whole bunch of other questions about fan participation and such that I just don't even know what to call, let alone whether or not they should be considered. I mean is a fan's question canon if Lizzie responds to them on twitter? What is that! I don't know!

This whole transmedia form is entirely different than what narrative theory usually deals with. But that doesn't mean I'm abandoning narrative theory all together. It just means I need to use it in a new way and possibly change some of the rules to suit my project. 

How I do that, I have no idea.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lyb8vr7o4y1qk682c.gif

-Danny

UPDATE (4/18/14): I found some YouTube playlists that people made. One is called "The Essentials" and I swear to god it's almost like this person found all of the kernels for me. If only I had found it sooner! The other one is called "The Darcy Heavy Episodes" which could also be considered a kernel playlist for those only focused on the romance as the driving force of the show. I don't really think that would be accurate, but whatever.

Coming Soon 2

Written on Monday, March 10, 2014 by Unknown

Now that the history section is done and I've defined most of the things that I need to define, I will be focusing on analysis.

This is the more abstract part of the thesis, where I ask questions and use what I've learned to try and figure things out. This is both the fun and the hard part.

Some topics I may cover:
If We Change, Will They Watch? - talking about the need to adhere to the novel to a certain extent, and what the changes might mean
The Differences Between Analyzing a TV Show and a Web Show - why certain things are both the same and different, looking at plot versus character
Narrative Theory - more stuff? I'm not quite there yet.

Some things I may create:
The other timelines (if possible) - like big social media events (i.e. the Wickham scandal or Jane's sad pinterest board)
Another video - maybe one that describes The Scene Function Model more fully
More twitter/social media conversations - with advisor, and possibly other people

These aren't necessarily in order.

But for now, this is a week by week update-as-I-go point in the thesis.

I have a meeting tomorrow, so we'll see what happens. 

http://www.dismountcreative.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/may_the_odds_hunger_games_thumb.jpg

Okay, that was a little grim. But funny. Very funny.

-Danny

Video #1: Narrative Theory - Kernels and Satellites

Written on Monday, March 10, 2014 by Unknown

My first video is officially complete. 

You can watch it here:


Why I made it:
1. It was fun.
2. It adds to the transmedia aspect of the thesis.
3. It allowed me to discuss some semi-boring stuff in a less boring way.

This video is inspired by the Draw My Life videos that became really popular last year. Honestly, it seemed like an easy way to approach this subject so that it wouldn't just be me talking to a camera, explaining a bunch of complicated things.

How I made it:
1. GoPro + whiteboard + printouts + other props + some serious lighting + Final Cut Pro X + voice over
2. A lot of books, articles, and research went into this. They can be found in my bibliography and in the video's description.
3. Patience. Or as much as I could muster. 

This was actually much more difficult than I had anticipated. I ran into a lot of unexpected problems. It was also the first time I had ever used the GoPro, and the studio and lighting equipment from my school. I also had never done a video like this before and probably overcompensated in terms of preparation, but that actually may have saved me some headaches.

It was a time suck, the result is not really what I wanted, the video goes too quickly sometimes and too slowly at other times, and overall I wouldn't call this my finest hour. But hey, I learned a lot from this one experience, and I'm glad I did it. The video isn't my best work, but it isn't horrible either. Maybe someone else might find it to be useful. Who knows.

So Danny, stop complaining. You worked hard. You did fine.

I may end up doing a second (very brief) one where I expand on the different types of kernel and satellite scenes. But not right now. Later. After I've had a mental break.

Until next time.
-Danny